Nachtegaalstraat 79B
Buiten Wittevrouwen · 3581 AE Utrecht
A classic Utrecht apartment
This apartment on the Nachtegaalstraat sits in Buiten Wittevrouwen, a lively part of Utrecht Oost. Built in 1870, it's a portiekflat on the second floor, with the energy label A. At €400,000, the asking price was 23% below the average last known asking price of €517,611 in the neighbourhood, which put it on the low side compared to other apartments in Utrecht. This home has not been online since 31 August 2026.
Inside the home
The apartment has three rooms, including two bedrooms and one bathroom, spread over one floor. The living area was 55 m² according to both the BAG registration and the agent's listing. It has double glazing and is heated by district heating. The monthly homeowners' association contribution was €163.01. The property is located in the centre and in a residential area.
Life in Buiten Wittevrouwen
Residents of the district give it an average score of 7.6, based on eleven reviews. One resident says: "The neighborhood is considered safe, has an active and engaged community, and is well maintained." Another notes: "It's a good neighbourhood but a lot could also be better in terms of cleanliness, parking, safety." The district has about 4,785 inhabitants, and many single-person households. The Buiten Wittevrouwen neighbourhood is known for its mix of old and new housing.
Amenities and transport
For daily groceries, Albert Heijn and Ekoplaza are just around the corner, with a Jumbo a couple of streets away. The Nieuwe Regentesseschool and KBS Montessori Buiten Wittevrouwen are both a five-minute walk. The GP practice De Reiger is a couple of streets away, and the pharmacy Alphega Apotheek Wilhelmina is just around the corner. Bus stop Maliebaan, served by line 8, is on your doorstep, and Utrecht Maliebaan train station is a five-minute walk. The municipality of Utrecht offers extensive amenities. According to area-level risk data, the noise from road traffic is 64 dB Lden, above the norm, while rail and air traffic noise are below the norm. The foundation risk indication is elevated, as the building dates from before 1970. Pluvial flooding risk is medium, and heat stress is medium, both current and in 2050. These are area-level indications, not an inspection of this specific home.
Source and agent
When this home was still on the market, it was offered via multiple channels, including Mark Renkema Makelaardij B.V. and Mark Renkema Makelaardij B.V. on Funda.
This summary was generated with AI and may contain errors. Always verify the details with the provider.
Features
Details of this home
Transfer
Price
Energy
Save up to € 400 on your energy billCompare nowAreas and volume
Insure your home and belongingsGet insuredLayout
Construction
Frequently asked questions
About Nachtegaalstraat 79B, Utrecht
What was the asking price per square metre?
The asking price was €400,000 for a living area of 55 m², which came to €7,273 per m² based on the agent's listing. This was below the neighbourhood average asking price of €517,611, and the price per m² was also lower than the average of €9,181 for homes at the time for sale in the neighbourhood.
How many rooms does the apartment have?
The apartment has three rooms in total: two bedrooms and one bathroom. It is located on the second floor and has a volume of 204 m³. The living area was 55 m², according to both the BAG registration and the agent's listing.
What is the energy label and what does it mean?
The energy label is A, which is an efficient label. The agent also stated that the home had double glazing and was heated by district heating. The energy label indicates the official energy performance, but it does not say anything about the structural condition of the building.
What is the WOZ value of this property?
The WOZ value is the municipal valuation, which is determined annually and is used for taxes. Without this figure, it was not possible to compare the asking price with the official valuation.
What are the noise levels like at this address?
According to area-level data, the noise from road traffic is 64 dB Lden, which is above the Dutch noise norm. Rail traffic noise is 31 dB Lden and air traffic noise is 40 dB Lden, both below the norm. These are indications for the area, not measurements at the property itself.
What is the foundation risk for this home?
The foundation risk indication is elevated. This is because the building was constructed before 1970, and the area is a KCAF attention area where 100% of properties were built before 1970. In this neighbourhood, 6% of properties have an elevated risk of pile rot, according to the Klimaateffectatlas. This is an area-level indication, not an inspection of this specific home.
What are the flood and heat stress risks?
The pluvial flooding risk is medium, meaning there is a moderate chance of flooding from heavy rain. The flood risk from rivers or the sea is low, both currently and in 2050. Heat stress is also medium, both now and in 2050. These are area-level indications based on climate data.
Which supermarkets are nearby?
Albert Heijn and Ekoplaza are both just around the corner, at about 126 metres. Another Albert Heijn is at 327 metres, and a Jumbo is at 451 metres. There are 65 supermarkets within 5 km, so you have plenty of choice for daily groceries.
What schools are close to this apartment?
The nearest primary schools are Nieuwe Regentesseschool at 312 metres and KBS Montessori Buiten Wittevrouwen at 315 metres. Vrije School Utrecht is at 363 metres. For secondary education, St-Gregorius College is at 440 metres. All are within a short walk.
How is the public transport connection?
The bus stop Utrecht, Maliebaan is on your doorstep, served by line 8. Another stop, Utrecht, Burgemeester Reigerstraat, is at 342 metres, also with line 8. The nearest train station is Utrecht Maliebaan at 376 metres, which is about a five-minute walk.
What is the neighbourhood like according to residents?
Residents of the district give it an average score of 7.6 out of 10, based on eleven reviews. One resident mentions that the neighbourhood is safe, has an active community, and is well maintained. Another says it is a good neighbourhood but could be cleaner and has parking and safety issues. These reviews are about the district, not specifically this street.
